Discussion in 'Loader Requests' started by Rizael95, Nov 13, 2016.
Is it possible to do a mod to reduce his size like a kid?
Are you taking about the size of his body or penis size?
the size of the body
No. In fact
Spoiler: not just no, but
From the Website rules page, located here:
Can't have kids in porn, man. It's incredibly illegal in most countries, and it's just plain icky. If you want a kind of dwarf body, that's another story. The build of a child and the build of an incredibly short man are two entirely different things, as are the intents behind their creation and their proliferation on this site.
That's incorrect. You inserted an ellipsis when quoting the website rules, and omitted a key word: real. The remainder of this post will be a discussion/clarification of the website policy; it's not a direct response to your post (or an attack on you). We've seen a few similar misunderstandings recently, so I'll just write up a general response -- and if it happens again then I'll link people to this post.
Photographic depictions of underaged people are forbidden, because they are derived from the exploitation of children.
Illustrated work - when it's based on imagination or fantasy - is allowed. Written lolicon stories are allowed. Games and mods involving underaged characters are allowed. Ageplay RP logs are allowed. In general, Undertow does not censor or suppress the erotic tastes of forum members on moral grounds. A work can depict non-consensual sexual interactions, so long as its actual production was done entirely by consenting adults.
We do ask members to tag, categorize, or conceal legally-dubious material -- for the sake of readers who might stumble upon it accidentally. In turn, we ask readers to withhold their moral condemnation. If someone posts untagged lolicon porn in the middle of an unrelated discussion, then please report that post and we'll remove it. If someone posts a thread devoted to lolicon material and you decide to visit it, then please don't complain.
There are some obvious grey-areas wherein we would need to exercise special caution -- such as an illustration which is traced from an actual CP image. That's not the case here. There's nothing inherently wrong with the SDT character-sizing mod concept. It has generally gone unfulfilled because:
there are technical complications which arise when resizing characters beyond the normal range
some of the SDT modders who can complete this task don't want to, because they're personally uncomfortable with loli/shota stuff. Please note the distinction here:
"I don't want to spend my own time creating <x> because I find it icky" is a perfectly acceptable statement.
"I want to discourage others from discussing or sharing <x> because it puts the Undertow website at risk" is a kind sentiment, but please check the rules very carefully before you do this. In some cases, you may be attempting to censor a topic when that topic is actually valid.
"I want to prevent others from creating, sharing, or enjoying <x> because I find it icky" goes against the principles of Undertow.
The part that really grinds my gears is that it's the only word in the sentence that got omitted.
I mean, it's a clever way to completely change the meaning of a quote, which is something I always find hilarious, but come on.
Seems like the dream lives on for you then, Rizael95!
Separate names with a comma.